Armenian Council

“Turkey, which has no diplomatic relations with Armenia, and which is perceived as an enemy, is a much more dangerous risk to Armenia’s security than Turkey with which we have …

“The growth of Russian influence in Armenia, even in the medium term, holds disastrous consequences for our sovereignty and statehood.”…“The direction Armenia is heading in and the integration processes it …

“The fact that our dependence on Russia and the blurring of red lines has both subjective and objective components is, I think, understandable to all”… …”Russia and the CSTO, if …

All previous phases of the Armenian-Turkish normalization process have failed, yet it would be a methodological mistake to condemn the future based on those past failures…  …The cornerstone of Russia’s …

“It is important to record a very simple truth: the negotiation process reflects the balance of power between the parties, and this is indisputable”… …”The anchor of Russia’s regional strategy …

The Sochi meeting was hastily organized under pressure from the Russian side. In the public sphere, it pursued one primary goal: to emphasize the Russian Federation’s exclusive role in the …

According to military-political expert Areg Kochinyan, the Brussels meeting was important because after the 44-day war, a trilateral format was created, which is actually quadrilateral (referring to Turkey – ed.), …

The meeting between Pashinyan and Aliyev in Brussels took place against the backdrop of their remote debate. Their public statements have notably clashed over the concept of the so-called “Zangezur …

“The logic regarding the corridor is: whoever controls it, owns it. If Armenia controls it, then there is no corridor. But if any power presence exists along this road besides …

“Our position has been different for different audiences. Internally, we continuously maintained, ‘Not a single inch of land, we will fight to the end, we have nothing to give up,’ …